top of page

Is Traditional Publishing better than Self-Publishing ?

Traditional publishing versus self-publishing remains a hotly debated topic in the literary world. Both avenues offer distinct advantages and drawbacks, making the choice a subjective one that largely depends on an author's goals, resources, and preferences.

There's no one-size-fits-all answer, but here's a quick breakdown of both paths:

Traditional Publishing:

  • Pros: Validation (it's a big deal!), professional editing, marketing push, wider distribution (think bookstores!), advances (money upfront!).

  • Cons: Competitive (getting picked is tough!), less control (cover design, editing), slower timeline (years to publication), lower royalty rates (typically 10-15%).


  • Pros: Complete creative control, higher potential royalties (up to 100%), faster publication (you're the boss!), perfect for niche genres.

  • Cons: You handle everything (editing, marketing, distribution), requires investment (covers, formatting), less industry prestige, discoverability can be a challenge.

The Takeaway:

  • Traditional publishing is a great choice for polished manuscripts with broad appeal, especially if you crave industry validation and a marketing boost.

  • Self-publishing empowers you to take charge and potentially earn more. It's ideal for niche genres, creative control enthusiasts, and those comfortable hustling for sales.

Ultimately, the best path depends on your goals, resources, and personality. Consider what success looks like for you and choose the route that aligns best with your vision.

Happy writing (and publishing)!

2 views0 comments


bottom of page